XDR vs SOAR: Key Differences, Benefits & Limitations

Explore the key differences, benefits, and limitations of XDR vs SOAR to choose the best security solution for your organization’s needs.

Blink Team
Author
Nov 12, 2024
 • 
7
 min read
Share this post

What is Extended Detection and Response (XDR)?

Extended Detection and Response (XDR) combines several security techniques into a single system to improve threat detection, investigation, and response. Unlike traditional solutions, XDR offers comprehensive visibility across endpoints, networks, servers, and cloud environments, allowing security professionals to identify and manage complex, multi-stage attacks quickly.

By combining data from several sources, XDR detects patterns and abnormalities that could indicate advanced threats. This centralization reduces manual work, speeds up incident response, and ultimately improves the organization's security posture.

What is Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR)?

Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) automates and streamlines security tasks, enhancing incident response by coordinating multiple tools and playbooks. This integration reduces manual work, enabling security teams to address threats faster and focus on complex challenges requiring human expertise, making it a necessary tool for security automation.

SOAR reduces detection and response time by automating routine tasks and enriching alerts with contextual data. For Security Operations Centers (SOCs), SOAR strengthens team collaboration, boosts workflow efficiency, and centralizes security processes onto a single platform. 

XDR vs SOAR: Key Differences

Even though both XDR and SOAR improve security operations, they do so in different ways and for different reasons. Below, we break down the key differences across various aspects to help you understand how each solution serves a unique role in modern cybersecurity.

Aspects XDR SOAR
Focus Concentrates on extended detection and response, offering a comprehensive view across security levels to identify advanced threats. Focuses on orchestration and automation, streamlining incident response by automating tasks and coordinating workflows.
Data Sources Integrates data from multiple layers, including endpoints, networks, servers, and cloud environments, to form a cohesive security strategy. Collects and centralizes threat data from various security tools but doesn’t inherently provide direct threat detection.
Response Mechanism Responds to threats with automated responses embedded in its detection capabilities, making it effective for rapid threat mitigation. Uses automated playbooks to orchestrate responses across security tools, enabling efficient response coordination.
Visibility Provides cross-layered visibility across diverse security environments for a holistic threat perspective. Primarily offers visibility into incident response workflows and task automation, rather than direct threat visibility.
Threat Management Actively identifies, prioritizes, and mitigates threats across systems, focusing on sophisticated and hidden attacks. Facilitates organized threat management through coordinated responses but doesn’t inherently detect threats.
Implementation May require extensive setup, especially if integrated with multiple security layers and existing infrastructure. Implemented mainly to coordinate existing tools, often with a faster setup focused on workflow efficiency.
Scalability Scales with extensive data input from varied environments, often requiring advanced infrastructure. Scales by handling increased automation workflows but relies on the capabilities of existing integrated tools.
Customizability Offers some customization, primarily in how it integrates data sources and configures detection thresholds. Highly customizable, allowing teams to create tailored workflows, playbooks, and response protocols.
User Interaction Security teams interact with centralized insights for detection and response, focusing on real-time alerts. Enables user-driven task management, allowing teams to coordinate responses across security tools.
Operational Efficiency Automates detection and response to improve operational efficiency and reduce response times for specific threats. Streamlines operational workflows, reducing repetitive tasks and improving team productivity.

XDR and SOAR Combined Use Cases

By combining XDR with SOAR, security operations are improved because of their assisting qualities. Some important ways in which their combination can improve cybersecurity initiatives are highlighted below.

1. Comprehensive Security

With XDR's broad detection across endpoints, networks, and cloud environments and SOAR’s ability to automate response workflows, organizations achieve a robust, unified security framework. This combined approach improves threat visibility and enables coordinated, prompt responses to complex security incidents.

2. Improved Threat Management

XDR’s multi-layered threat detection pairs effectively with SOAR's automated response capabilities. Together, they streamline threat handling, minimize risk exposure, and boost the efficiency of security operations.

3. Proactive Threat Hunting

Leveraging XDR’s expansive data reach with SOAR’s orchestration capabilities enables continuous, proactive threat hunting. This setup empowers teams to identify and address potential threats across different environments before they can impact operations.

4. Streamlined Incident Response for Distributed Networks

XDR centralizes detection across large infrastructures, and SOAR automates reactions across networks that are spread out in different places. This setup is demonstrated in incident response with Blink and Panther, and allows you to respond quickly and consistently, keeping all places safe.

5. Automated Compliance and Audit Reporting

SOAR’s automation of reporting, combined with XDR’s consolidated data, simplifies compliance efforts. Automated report generation using XDR insights minimizes the need for manual reporting, supporting regulatory compliance efficiently.

6. Enhanced Phishing Detection and Response

XDR identifies phishing across multiple attack surfaces, and SOAR can quickly contain these threats by isolating affected systems or alerting users. This combination shortens response times and mitigates phishing risk effectively.

7. Optimized Resource Allocation

SOAR handles less important alerts automatically, while XDR works on finding critical threats. With this division, security teams can better plan how to use their resources, giving more attention to the most important events.

8. Advanced Malware Containment

SOAR can instantly initiate automated containment processes across impacted systems when XDR detects advanced malware. By stopping the propagation of malware, this quick reaction frees security professionals to concentrate on investigation and fixing.

XDR vs SOAR: Pros and Cons

When comparing XDR with SOAR, it is critical to understand their unique advantages and downsides. Here's an overview of the benefits and drawbacks of each technology to help you make an informed selection.

XDR Pros and Cons

XDR Pros XDR Cons
Protection from Attacks: XDR provides powerful protection by continuously monitoring and analyzing potential threats across multiple environments. High Cost: XDR implementations can be costly, especially for more comprehensive solutions.
Custom Alerts and Notifications: Enables tailored alerts, helping security teams focus on the most relevant issues. Integration Challenges with Legacy Systems: Integrating XDR with older systems can pose challenges, potentially limiting its effectiveness.
Cross-Platform Visibility: Offers unified visibility across endpoints, networks, and cloud environments, providing comprehensive threat insights. Skilled Personnel Requirements: Requires personnel with specialized skills to manage and optimize the system.
Automated Threat Response: XDR’s automation capabilities respond to threats in real-time, minimizing potential impacts. Complexity in Implementation: XDR deployment can be complex and may require substantial time and resources.
Unified and Integrated Visibility: Combines multiple data sources into a single view, improving situational awareness. Overreliance on Automation: While automation is beneficial, relying too heavily on it may lead to missed nuanced threats requiring human insight.
Enhanced Detection and Response Capabilities: Uses advanced analytics to detect sophisticated attacks and respond quickly. High Data Storage and Processing Demands: XDR solutions are data-intensive, which may increase infrastructure needs and costs.
Operational Efficiency and Improved Coordination: Streamlines operations by integrating tools and coordinating responses. N/A
Continuous Monitoring and Real-Time Detection: Offers real-time detection to help security teams respond proactively.
Advanced Analytics and Machine Learning: Incorporates AI and ML to improve threat detection accuracy and reduce false positives.
Scalable and Flexible Solution: Adapts to growing needs, making it a versatile solution for organizations of various sizes.

SOAR Pros and Cons

SOAR Pros SOAR Cons
Automates Repetitive Security Tasks: Reduces manual workloads by automating routine tasks, freeing up resources. Complexity of Implementation: This requires careful setup and customization, which can be time-consuming.
Enhances Team Collaboration: Centralizes data and responses, improving coordination across security teams. High Maintenance and Support Needs: Needs regular updates and maintenance to keep automation workflows optimized.
Reduces Response Time to Security Incidents: Accelerates response times through automated workflows, minimizing risk exposure. May Not be Suitable for Smaller Organizations Due to Costs: The cost and complexity may make it less ideal for smaller companies.
Integrates with a Range of Security Tools: Works seamlessly with existing security tools, providing a cohesive incident response environment. Integration Challenges with Legacy Systems: Can face integration challenges when used alongside outdated systems.
Streamlines Incident Response and Orchestration: Automates workflows, making incident response faster and more efficient. Dependence on Skilled Personnel for Management: Requires skilled staff to create, maintain, and optimize workflows.
Facilitates Threat Information Collection and Complex Threat Triage: Centralizes threat data, simplifying triage processes for security teams. Overreliance on Automation: Automation can miss nuanced threats, which is why human oversight is necessary to ensure comprehensive security.
Enables Real-Time Response with Automated Playbooks: Uses pre-configured playbooks to respond quickly to incidents. N/A
Provides Comprehensive Case Management for Compliance: Ensures incident documentation, aiding in compliance reporting.
Adapts to Evolving Threats with Machine Learning: Some SOAR platforms leverage ML to refine response strategies over time.
Manages Phishing Threats through Automated Filtering: Detects and mitigates phishing threats automatically, reducing exposure.
Supports Threat Hunting with IOC Data: Leverages indicators of compromise (IOC) to enhance threat-hunting capabilities.

XDR vs SOAR: How to Choose the Right Solution

Before deciding between XDR and SOAR, your business should evaluate its unique security requirements, current resources, and operational goals. The following are the primary considerations:

1. Threat Detection Needs

  • XDR: Ideal for organizations seeking extensive threat detection across endpoints, networks, and cloud environments. XDR offers in-depth visibility and advanced detection, making it suitable for companies facing complex, multi-stage attacks.

  • SOAR: Best suited for companies aiming to streamline their security operations by automating response workflows. SOAR is valuable for incident response and reducing the manual workload on security teams.

2. Incident Response Requirements

  • XDR: For businesses prioritizing a unified view across different environments with automated responses, XDR simplifies detecting and containing advanced threats in real-time.

  • SOAR: If your goal is to organize and coordinate responses across various tools, SOAR’s automated playbooks can orchestrate and improve response times.

3. Resource Availability

  • XDR: Requires advanced technical expertise to set up and manage, making it better suited for organizations with a dedicated, skilled security team.

  • SOAR: Typically requires security teams familiar with playbook creation and workflow management and may be implemented alongside existing solutions like SIEM.

4. Integration with Existing Tools

  • XDR: Integrates well into environments needing a consolidated detection platform across multiple security domains. It’s ideal for centralized management.

  • SOAR: It can connect existing security tools and automate responses, providing high flexibility for companies with established security infrastructures.

5. Scalability Needs

  • XDR: Scalable for large enterprises that need continuous monitoring and adaptable threat detection across growing infrastructures.

  • SOAR: Suitable for companies looking to scale response workflows and optimize coordination among teams, especially as new security tools are added.

6. Budget and ROI

  • XDR: Usually involves higher upfront and operational costs due to its advanced analytics and detection capabilities.

  • SOAR: Can be a cost-effective choice for organizations focused on optimizing current operations, as it enhances efficiency without necessarily adding new detection layers.

How XDR and SOAR Work Together

XDR and SOAR effectively improve security threat identification, automation, and response. Combining both systems' characteristics creates an innovative, streamlined security environment. The main ways that XDR and SOAR complement one another are below.

Unified Threat Detection and Response

XDR can gather data from endpoints, networks, and the cloud to provide complete threat visibility. SOAR's automated workflows enable quick, coordinated responses to threats, decreasing reaction time and effect.

Enhanced Efficiency Through Automation

SOAR automates repetitive security tasks, allowing XDR to focus on complex threat detection and analysis. By offloading routine tasks to SOAR’s playbooks, security teams can use XDR’s advanced detection capabilities more effectively, focusing resources on high-priority incidents.

Improved Threat Intelligence Integration

XDR uses a variety of data sources to get detailed information on security risks. SOAR adds to this intelligence by combining external sources and automating responses based on rules already set. This combination gives a fuller picture for threat analysis and reaction, which helps people make better decisions.

Streamlined Incident Response and Reporting

With XDR centralizing detection and SOAR orchestrating response actions, incident management becomes smoother and more efficient. SOAR’s automation also supports real-time reporting and compliance documentation, aligning security operations with regulatory standards.

Scalable Security Framework

As companies grow, the integration of XDR and SOAR offers a scalable security framework. XDR scales by adapting to increasing data sources, while SOAR scales automation workflows, ensuring comprehensive coverage without additional manual oversight.

Conclusion 

Combining XDR and SOAR will create a dynamic defense system that can deal with modern, complex threats thanks to unified detection, automated responses, and better operating efficiency. XDR provides an extensive system for detection across endpoints, networks, and the cloud. SOAR enhances this by automating processes and coordinating responses. Together, these options give security teams the power to stop threats before they happen, make the best use of resources, and make compliance easier.

No items found.
No items found.